martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016

MercatorNet: America’s legendary ignorance about Africa persists

MercatorNet: America’s legendary ignorance about Africa persists

America’s legendary ignorance about Africa persists

America’s legendary ignorance about Africa persists

Negative perceptions continue to dominate the thinking of major political leaders
Julius A. Amin | Sep 20 2016 | comment 

Fifty six years ago, John F. Kennedy made 479 references to Africa during the US presidential campaign. He observed that America had lost ground on the continent because of failures to meet the “need and aspirations of the African people”.
President Kennedy charted a new path in US-Africa relations. He created the Peace Corps, and the United States Agency for International Development. And, unlike his predecessors, he began to show more respect and dignity for African leaders.
To African people, Kennedy was the “great one,” and a “friend of the coloured man everywhere”. He began the process to change the “ugly American” image which characterised his predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower’s, foreign policy towards the Third World.
But the new directions initiated by Kennedy were short-lived as his successors reverted to previous policies. While Lyndon Johnson labelled Africans “cannibals” , Richard Nixon ridiculed blacks as “genetically inferior” to whites. And, Ronald Reagan’s pro-Apartheid policy of Constructive Engagement was consistent with his overall African policy.
Though more recently during President Barack Obama’s presidency there was a shift in policy, there continues to be immense and sometimes shameful ignorance in America about Africa. Popular notions range from seeing the continent through a monolithic lens to depicting it as suffocated with disease, tribal wars, famine, corruption, cannibals and crime.
Even the Peace Corps and university students, both a hallmark of American idealism, were not immune. While some Peace Corps officials talked of “primitive mud huts” all over Africa’s landscape, college students imagined the region to be a
place of destruction, primitive conditions, and injustice, and where people practice strange religions.
Though scholars have long discarded those images and corrected the historical record, the negative perceptions have persisted, and continue to dominate the thinking of major political leaders in America.
In an increasingly interconnected and technological global environment, ignorance of Africa is no longer acceptable. This, especially from major political leaders. Yet, examples of such ignorance are evident in the current American presidential campaign. Neither the Republican nomineeDonald J. Trump nor the democratic nominee Hillary R. Clinton has articulated any concrete vision for an African policy.
During the primary season, Africa came up and when it did it was either in the context of terrorism or as an afterthought. There seems to be little realisation by both candidates that in the current fluid and interdependent global environment, Africa has emerged as a strategic partner in trade, peace, and security. A case in point is the US African Command which collaborates with African governments and regional organisations to combat terrorism.
Africa in perspective     
Africa, the second largest continent, is over three times the size of the US and has 54 nations. It is the ancestral home of roughly 13% of America’s population; namely African-Americans.
Its complex cultures, languages, and religions have contributed to global cultures. It is the ancestral site of humankind. It is home to renowned economic, social and educational institutions including the University of Cape TownUniversity of Ghana, and the University of Ibadan. Its other impressive institutions include the Dangote Group businesses and the Kofi Annan Institute for Conflict Transformation. It is also the land of vital minerals such as coltan, essential for the world’s software and telecommunication industry.
Africa’s raw materials are vital to the global economic system. Its rising consumer culture has transformed the continent into a major market for manufactured goods.
Two years ago at the US-African Leaders Summit President Obama called for the creation of “genuine partnership” in US-Africa relations. Africa is now a key battleground for the US and China where both nations are locked in a struggle to gain a competitive edge.
From Cairo to Cape Town, China through its Forum of China Africa Cooperation and other endeavours, has surpassed US investments on the continent.
Embracing Africa    
Engaging Africa in a much more serious way, particularly within the foreign policy discourse in the American presidential campaign, would be an important step. Both candidates must build on the foundation started by Kennedy and later continued by Obama which sees Africa as a “fundamental part of our interconnected world,” and seek a relationship based on mutual “responsibility” and “respect”.
Both things are doable. Trump and Clinton should articulate a concrete vision and means by which they will implement it. Development is not just about economic imperatives, and other quantitative things, it also entails informed knowledge.
The time has come for developed nations to eliminate the large pockets of ignorance which exist in their society about Africa and other peoples. Globalisation demands that people ask new questions, seek new answers, and think differently. For all the challenges, African communities are coming together. It is, indeed, a continent on the rise and can no longer be ignored or marginalised.
Julius A. Amin, Professor, Department of History, University of Dayton. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


Apart from asking whether you support Clinton or Trump, there is no more incendiary question nowadays than: is gay parenting as good as straight parenting? But most of the ensuing argument will be conducted in a fact-free zone. Unfortunately this is not only the case at water coolers, but in courts and legislatures as well. In today's feature we review a mammoth article by American sociologist Walter Schumm in which he debunks the official consensus on the issue. Check it out.
There's still time to vote for your favourite romantic novel -- we'd especially like nominations of more contemporary authors. Enter the MercatorNet survey now! 

Michael Cook 

Is there really no difference between straight and gay parenting?
By Michael Cook
The consensus is flawed by small-scale studies, badly framed questions and poorly understood data
Read the full article
To strengthen schools, start with the family
By Carolyn Moynihan
New research shows family structure is strongly linked to educational success.
Read the full article
Euthanasia for kids kicks off in Belgium
By Michael Cook
The first death under the country's new law occurred last week
Read the full article
America’s legendary ignorance about Africa persists
By Julius A. Amin
Negative perceptions continue to dominate the thinking of major political leaders
Read the full article
The new religion of transgenderism in Australian schools
By Michael Cook
Australia's Safe Schools program is so bizarre and fact-free that you can describe it as a cult, says an academic
Read the full article
Sophie Ellis-Bextor inspires with her family ethic
By Tamara El-Rahi
An inspiration where other pop stars fail to be.
Read the full article
Great novels about romance
By Carolyn Moynihan
Readers, give us your suggestions for best novels about romance and marriage.
Read the full article
Four innovative foodies
By Shannon Roberts
New ideas deserve to be celebrated.
Read the full article
Secret experiments on animals revealed
By Jennifer Minicus
Raffa discovers the truth behind investments in scientific research.
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

No hay comentarios: