When a ‘good death’ was often painful
by Caitlin Mahar | 30 Sep 2017 | 2 comments
Most of us have an ambivalent attitude towards drug addicts. Can they stop? No, their will power is shot to pieces. Will you invite one home to dinner? No, he’s a drug addict. However inconsistent it might be, we manage to dismiss addiction as morally serious and stigmatize them at the same time.
The Massachusetts Supreme Court is due to hear a case on drug addiction which could have wide-ranging consequences. Julie Eldred, an addict, relapsed while on parole and was jailed. (See story below.) But jailing her was wrong, according to the Massachusetts Medical Society, because opioid use is a chronic illness, not a character defect.
The opposite point of view is represented by 11 addiction experts in an amicus curiae brief. They argue that “Most addicts quit and do so on their own. Addiction seems to be among the most spontaneously ‘remitting’ of all the conditions termed major mental disorders, which is a very inconvenient fact for the position that addiction is a ‘chronic and relapsing brain disease.’”
The outcome of the argument will have immense legal and social consequences. If the addict is helpless in the grip of his or her disease, punishment makes no sense. The whole criminal law would change. To be continued....
The Massachusetts Supreme Court is due to hear a case on drug addiction which could have wide-ranging consequences. Julie Eldred, an addict, relapsed while on parole and was jailed. (See story below.) But jailing her was wrong, according to the Massachusetts Medical Society, because opioid use is a chronic illness, not a character defect.
The opposite point of view is represented by 11 addiction experts in an amicus curiae brief. They argue that “Most addicts quit and do so on their own. Addiction seems to be among the most spontaneously ‘remitting’ of all the conditions termed major mental disorders, which is a very inconvenient fact for the position that addiction is a ‘chronic and relapsing brain disease.’”
The outcome of the argument will have immense legal and social consequences. If the addict is helpless in the grip of his or her disease, punishment makes no sense. The whole criminal law would change. To be continued....
 Michael Cook Editor BioEdge |  |  |  |
NEWS THIS WEEK
by Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2017
The Massachusetts Supreme Court could decideby Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2017
Staff were sharing photos on their smartphonesby Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2017
The Lancet called this week for humanitarian support to be “urgently deployed" in Myanmar.by Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2017
Opponents are trying to drum up support for a resolutionby Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2017
Body used for tissue samples or organsby Michael Cook | Sep 30, 2017
Four doctors on trialby Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2017
Is a PVS patient really gone forever?by Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2017
Bioethicists are getting resourceful in their search to solve the organ donation crisis.by Xavier Symons | Sep 30, 2017
Ireland will soon vote on its controversial constitutional abortion restrictions.IN DEPTH THIS WEEK
by Caitlin Mahar | Sep 30, 2017
Until the 19th century, pain was accepted as a normal part of dyingBioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
BioEdge: When a ‘good death’ was often painful
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario