viernes, 27 de octubre de 2017

Are the kids really OK? | MercatorNet |October 27, 2017| MercatorNet |

Are the kids really OK?

| MercatorNet |October 27, 2017| MercatorNet |

Are the kids really OK?

Australia's best-known medical journal presents a comforting picture of gay parenting.
Michael Cook | Oct 27 2017 | comment 4 

“The kids are OK: it is discrimination, not same-sex parents, that harms children.” This headline in the Medical Journal of Australia was repeated around the country in the middle of a heated national debate over legalising same-sex marriage. 
The article looked impressive: 13 authors from Melbourne’s Murdoch Children’s Research Institute presenting a “consensus of the peer-reviewed research”. This is, according to the authors, that: “children raised in same-sex parented families do as well emotionally, socially and educationally as children raised by heterosexual couple parents.”
Indeed, “Some research has indicated that children with same-sex parents do better [emphasis added] than other children. In addition to equivalent social and educational outcomes, these studies conclude that children raised by same-sex couples show better psychological adjustment, and greater open-mindedness towards sexual, gender and family diversity.”
However, a closer look at the sketchy data presented in the MJA article suggests that this is utterly irresponsible scholarship.
In a tight vote, a widely-publicised article in Australia’s leading medical magazine could tip the balance of public opinion. The authors had a duty to their profession and the public to present a critique which is as up-to-date and comprehensive as possible.
In fact, they ignored recent studies of the “consensus” which argued that the kids might not be OK. The only article cited which cast doubt on this consensus was the so-called Regnerus study published in 2012. Dr Regnerus was abused so mercilessly for questioning the consensus that the Melbourne academics may have thought that no one would dare break ranks ever again. In a field as contested as same-sex parenting, it’s easy to be swayed by bias. But it appears that the authors of this brief study were not so much swayed as swept away by a tsunami of attachment.
In any case, some very able scholars have kept asking awkward questions about the "consensus" over the past five years. The articles are on the public record and readily available. Could someone explain how the Melbourne researchers could have overlooked these two articles published only a year ago?
Schumm points out that most studies have involved relatively small, non-random samples; that most involved families with extremely high income and education, especially for gay fathers; that most omitted assessment of delayed gratification, impulsivity, emotional regulation, self-control, willpower, or time preference – qualities which foreshadow adult outcomes better than open-mindedness toward gender diversity.
Schumm concludes that “Much of the literature can be summarized in favor of the 'no differences' hypothesis if one only considers one-time studies of either young children or children who have spent very few years in a same-sex parental household. At the same time, if one focuses on either longitudinal studies or studies of adolescent or adult children from same-sex families, then there is much more evidence not in favor of the 'no differences' hypothesis.”
This is a major meta-analysis of the empirical evidence on same-sex parenting over the previous 35 years. It found that “There were negative associations between living with gay or lesbian parents and several outcomes”.
However, the author, Thomas Schofield, of Ohio State University, acknowledges that the field of same-sex parenting is a minefield. For one thing, gay and lesbian parents are “a small and hard-to-reach” group. Most of the studies, therefore, focus on “Caucasian, female, middle-class, urban, and well-educated” parents. Since most same-sex couples in the US are socio-economically disadvantaged, this means that the data may be skewed.
When are the kids OK? The Melbourne researchers do not pose this question but it is important. “Living with a gay or lesbian parent was associated with positive outcomes for younger children and negative outcomes for older children,” Schofield notes. This should give supporters of same-sex marriage pause. Parenting is about raising healthy, well-adjusted adults, not Peter Pans.
And what about bias? Schofield does not accuse colleagues of deliberately putting their fingers on the scales, but his analysis came up with some interesting correlations. “The allegiance of the authors to the no difference hypothesis [that hetero- and homosexual parenting are the same] was consistently associated with effect size.”
Schofield ends his meta-analysis with a plea for deeper and more robust research:
Regardless of social and political allegiances, ideally scientists strive to support parents, including gay and lesbian parents, by providing them accurate information about what the data show. It is important that scientists supplement this information with equally accurate conclusions. As one early researcher of differences between the children of gay or lesbian and heterosexual parents advised, “It is imperative that decisions that affect the lives of children be made on the basis of empirical data rather than assumptions or personal emotions”
How could 13 skilled researchers overlook these substantial challenges to their hypothesis? One possible answer is that they are all associated with the same institution. If they have been swimming together in the same fishbowl for many years, it might be hard to imagine that other fishbowls – or oceans – exist.
The scientific method doesn’t work unless researchers engage with competing hypotheses. This highly politicised article in the Medical Journal of Australia turned a blind eye to articles which challenged the authors’ own bias. You can prove anything you like if you choose your own facts.
Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet.


October 27, 2017

Forgive me for mentioning Harvey Weinstein again, but his name has become symbolic of the cultural rot once known as sexual liberation. No, it’s not just him or the legion of other prominent men (not excepting a 93-year-old ex-president) who have forced their attentions, and more, on women; it is, as family scholar Andrea Mrozek writes today, a wide swathe of society whose exploitation of sex for monetary or other gains is evident at every turn.

I recently watched the movie Hidden Figures, about the black women working for NASA on the first space programme. (Excellent film, btw.) It has a memorable scene where the male boss takes a sledgehammer to a whites-only toilet (sorry, Americans, “bathroom”) sign so the black women don’t have to run half a mile to a facility dedicated to them.

How long will it be before feminists take sledgehammers to, quoting Andrea, the “larger than life dominatrix-style lingerie ads” in shopping malls that assault men and women alike – and above all, children? Don’t hold your breath. No wonder millions of people have been gawking at a video of an 8-year-old boy drag queen (see article). If anything shows how low the culture has sunk, and how pitiless it is to children, it’s that.

Speaking of children – the Medical Journal of Australia has recycled the “no differences” theory of same-sex parenting, obviously hoping to influence the final days of the referendum on same-sex marriage. Check out Michael Cook’s critique and update on the studies.

Carolyn Moynihan
Deputy Editor,
Was Emily Brontё‘s Heathcliff black?
By Corinne Fowler
It makes sense. The Brontё family had black slaves in their neighbourhood.
Read the full article
More than Harvey’s secret is out
By Andrea Mrozek
Everything from relationships to shopping malls is corrupted.
Read the full article
Martin Luther’s post-modern legacy: reason refuting reason
By John Robson
The 16th Century theologian foreshadowed some contemporary pathologies
Read the full article
I was an eight-year-old drag queen
By Chad Felix Greene
Sexualising children has dangerous consequences.
Read the full article
Balancing patients’ liberty and public safety in mental health care
By Niall McCraeand Kathy Gyngell
It’s in everybody’s interests to provide a dignified mental health service.
Read the full article
Are the kids really OK?
By Michael Cook
Australia's best-known medical journal presents a comforting picture of gay parenting.
Read the full article
Big Pharma versus Mother Teresa
By Karl D. Stephan
You need love as well as money to deliver excellent medical care
Read the full article
Reports of his demise have been greatly exaggerated
By Michael Cook
Fake news hits the Vatican: Benedict XVI is dying!!!!!
Read the full article
Love and Fidelity at 10: students building a culture of sexual integrity
By Carolyn Moynihanand Alain Oliver
If you don't want Weinstein culture, get behind initiatives like this.
Read the full article
Japan election: NK and birth rates
By Marcus Roberts
Can the new government do anything about these potentially existential threats?
Read the full article
Tolkien fan science and the flora of Middle-earth
By Harley J. Sims
We should resist the temptation to identify a fictional world with our own.
Read the full article
Bride trafficking to China
By Marcus Roberts
Courtesy of the one child policy.
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AU | +61 2 8005 8605

No hay comentarios: