martes, 2 de agosto de 2016

MercatorNet: Isn’t killing 19 disabled people a hate crime?

MercatorNet: Isn’t killing 19 disabled people a hate crime?

Isn’t killing 19 disabled people a hate crime?

Why didn't Japan's biggest mass killing since World War II create more waves in the media?
Paul Russell | Aug 2 2016 | comment 

On July 26 19 intellectually disabled men and women were executed as they slept in a pre-dawn attack upon a care facility in Sagamirihara, Japan. They were aged between 19 to 70. Twenty-six others were injured.
The media characterised the attacks as “senseless” and “incomprehensible”. Perhaps. But for my many friends in the disability community it is an extreme example of the kind of prejudice that they experience all too often.
The killer was clearly deranged. But we ought to recognise that many sane people agree with his “reasons”. In a letter the killer sent to the Japanese Parliament some time before his heinous actions he wrote:
I envision a world where a person with multiple disabilities can be euthanized, with an agreement from the guardians, when it is difficult for the person to carry out household and social activities.
I believe there is still no answer about the way of life for individuals with multiple disabilities. The disabled can only create misery.
He also cited an economic benefit to the destruction of disabled people and went on to describe precisely how he would go about his crimes.
Syracuse NY disability activist and academic, Bill Peace wrote on his blog:
This hate crime and mass murder led to a sleepless night for me. What took place could have happened in any nation. It could have taken place in Omaha, Nebraska, Cambridge, England, Paris, France, or Syracuse, NY. As I read story after story I felt a chill go down my spine, diffuse at T-3 when I read the following words: 'He was just an ordinary young fellow.'
I have no doubt he was an ordinary young fellow. That is what makes ableism so frightening. People, typical people, think life with a disability is worse than death. I plan to go out to lunch with my son. We will likely stop at a cross walk and wait for a light to turn. A biped will likely stand near me. That biped might be thinking, "shit, if I were paralysed I would prefer to be dead. That guy should be dead. He sucks up too much health care dollars". This is what scares me. The silence. How many silently wish we people with a disability did not exist. My concerns are shared by many who have a disability and more generally any person with an atypical body.
Canadian blogger and disability activist Dave Hingsburger had a similar reaction:
The discussion of and public endorsement of the concept of mercy killing of people with disabilities had taken root in this man with alarming ferocity. No doubt he will be spoken of as someone who has mental health issues, and maybe he does, but when you read what he says, what he says isn't far from what most people have come to believe.
His statement to the police upon turning himself in that “it's better that disabled people disappear” isn't a deranged rant by someone out of control, it's a calm statement of fact that echoes the sentiment of many in society. People with disabilities know this sentiment, we hear it, we experience it and we have come to fear what it will do. Our lives are devalued, are needs seen as special and therefore burdensome, our rights are declared to be gifts rather than guarantees.
Peace calls out the killing as a “hate crime’ and broadens the context:
The hate crime in Japan graphically and horrifically demonstrates that people with a disability are prone to being the victims of violence. That violence includes murder. How many more people need to die before ableism is acknowledged as a global problem?
The violence I refer to takes many forms. Hollywood knows films that kill disabled characters for their own merciful fend of life resonates well with audiences. Police in the United States have killed a host of people with a disability. Parents who murder their disabled children are given light sentences for their crimes. Donald Trump openly mocked a disabled reporter from the New York Times.
Most recently the video of a man trying to help an autistic client of his was shot. The police bemoaned the fact they missed the man with autism. They tried to kill him. Yes, their intent was to kill a man from a group home with autism that was playing with a toy truck. This sort of violence is spun in a myriad of ways. It also appears as if the massacre in Japan has lost the media's attention. There is no live coverage on CNN.
The story quickly fell off news websites. Only one journalist to my knowledge, Yuichi Sakaguchi, a senior staff writer at the Nikkei Asian Review made the hate crime connection. Little wonder that Hingsburger should ask: Why isn't it a hate crime?
I think the answer goes deeper than “they don't get it.” I think it's because, maybe a little, people see the logic of what he's done.
And that scares the hell out of me.
These fears are real; they are held by close and trusted friends and my own family.
And that's why people like Australian journalist and euthanasia enthusiast Andrew Denton's patronising dismissal of concerns about euthanasia and disability has angered many in the disability community. Denton visited places like Belgium, Holland and Oregon, where euthanasia and or assisted suicide is legal and asked those who run peak bodies for disabled people and senior citizens if they knew of any abuses. He found none.
I have been to Belgium and Holland too and I found the opposite. So I guess we did not talk to the same people.
The fears that come from experience don't appear in the statistics. A sideways look, a muttered remark, a suggestion, being defined as a burden, the assumption that life with disability is not a worthy life.
We can't test everything that matters with studies and surveys. Sometimes we have to rely on the depth of sentiment held by those who feel the pain, who sense the risks.
Not all people with disabilities have had such negative experiences, but many do. Craig Wallace, former President of People With Disabilities Australia, noted the lack of outrage at the Japanese hate crime on Twitter:

One of my favourite prophets is Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. A bit pessimistic and gloomy at times, but if there was anyone who spoke the truth to power, it was he. In 1978, in exile in the United States, he gave a memorable address at Harvard University which probably infuriated his hosts. Its theme was the corruption of the Western intelligentsia, in particular its legalism:
"I have spent all my life under a Communist regime and I will tell you that a society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed. But a society with no other scale than the legal one is not quite worthy of man either … Whenever the tissue of life is woven of legalistic relations, there is an atmosphere of moral mediocrity, paralyzing man's noblest impulses."
Solzhenitsyn attended that harshest of schools, the Soviet Gulag, where he eventually became a Christian. Seeing the steadfastness of Christians in the camps, he realized the shortcomings of materialism, whether Communist or capitalist.
“To defend oneself, one must also be ready to die,” he said. “There is little such readiness in a society raised in the cult of material well-being. Nothing is left, then, but concessions, attempts to gain time, and betrayal.”
All this is by way of introduction to a two-volume book reviewed below by Francis Phillips, The God of the Gulag, about Christians martyred in Russia and Eastern Europe. God knows how many there were – probably millions. But rather than numbers, what is striking is their steadfastness. Are we made of the same stuff?

Michael Cook 

Soviet gulags revived the ancient tradition of Christian martyrs
Francis Phillips | ABOVE | 2 August 2016
For eight decades persecuted Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe suffered unspeakable hardships
Isn’t killing 19 disabled people a hate crime?
Paul Russell | CAREFUL! | 2 August 2016
Why didn't Japan's biggest mass killing since World War II create more waves in the media?
Sitting out this hand
J. Budziszewski | FEATURES | 2 August 2016
A philosopher argues that it is not possible for him to vote for either candidate for president in the US election.
MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605

No hay comentarios: