Here’s one clear and uncomplicated principle for voting
Don’t vote for pro-abortion politicians
from the BBC
The choice should be clear and uncomplicated.
Nearly all of this election cycle has been almost historically unclear and terribly complicated. There are few certainties, and then campaign rhetoric and media spin can cast doubt even about those.
But one thing that is, was brought up at a major annual convention recently, got distorted in reporting by some media, and then clarified by an astute journalist of the highest integrity, and it all came down to one simple, concise message: Not voting for ‘pro-choice’ candidates is the least we can do.
Catholics and other Christians have helped get the country into the abortion divide for more than fifty years. Time to change that grave mistake.
Carl Anderson (a true leader in an age with a dearth of them) Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus (an outstanding organization by any objective standard) addressed their annual convention in Toronto just over a week ago. Journalist Kathryn Jean Lopez was there, not planning to write about it, but taking notes as always. Talking with me on radio this Monday about events lately, the Knights’ involvement in international relief efforts in humanitarian crises, always protecting and defending human life and dignity, Kathryn said she saw Anderson’s brief remarks about moral responsibility in the political process distorted by some media into something he didn’t say, and decided to write about it after all. I’m so glad she did.
What this article says is so clear and concise and necessary.
Repeating something he said eight years ago, Anderson told those gathered: “The right to abortion is not just another political issue; it is in reality a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.” To his Toronto audience, he pointed out: “Forty million is greater than the entire population of Canada.” He asked: “What political issue could possibly outweigh this human devastation? The answer, of course, is that there is none.”
Kathryn told me that Carl Anderson went back to an address he gave two election cycles ago, in 2008, and delivered “non-partisan, uncontroversial” remarks to this gathering at this time in our history, because they applied in a timeless way. He named no candidate, no party, gave no endorsements or voting preferences other than that message about voting for candidates for office who would uphold the right of every human being to have a life in the first place, which then could be welcomed, sheltered, cared for, all the provisions the social gospel calls for as every believing Christian is called to know and to carry out.
If you won’t guarantee a human life has the right to continue to exist, you cannot make a coherent argument that any goods or rights or provisions should or must, in the name of justice, be provided human life. It’s really that simple.
As Anderson says, there is a poison in our polity. Pluralism has encountered something grave, something that for more than four decades we have allowed to become a hidden background story, as we refer to it with euphemisms and hardened activism. What we need is the truth we can see on a sonogram — along with tender mercy, especially for those who have suffered because of the mainstreaming of abortion as a faux symbol of health care and freedom, even to the point of instituting government mandates in health-insurance coverage to make us believe these things.
She expanded on theses points again on Crux.
Anderson said abortion must be a priority. He didn’t say it’s the only thing we need to care about, but he did say that when assessing a candidate it ought to be a showstopper and a game-changer, and he’s completely right.
A point worth making is that Anderson was not speaking in the context of an academic theological debate. He was making an argument for a new, non-partisan political strategy, which is that we can change policy by withholding our vote from any candidate, of any party, who supports abortion.
Anderson sees that voting for pro-abortion politicians for other reasons has not brought them closer to a moral position, or even the pro-restriction position that polling shows is held by 8 in 10 Americans. His point was that at a time when America’s fundamental moral direction seems up for grabs, encouraging a pro-abortion candidate, for whatever reason, is not a wise prudential choice.
That’s all the more so as another Catholic vice-presidential candidate wraps himself in the flag of Pope Francis. Yet Francis, as it happens, is also against abortion.
This is not complicated, and should not be easily distorted or spun.
If there’s any breaking news in Anderson’s remarks, it is that we remain stuck in an unnecessary divide. This election is an opportunity for Catholics, for other Christians and religious believers, and all people of good will.
Don’t be party people. Be a people of life.
Talking about politics and practical front-line work, Anderson said to his brother Knights of Columbus: “Every time we save a life, we change the course of history.”
The dignity of work is an elusive quality to which we pay lip service, but often forget. It disappears when we work only for money, or only for career advancement, or only for social prestige. But most people don't have jobs which allow them to buy a new car every year or run big corporations. They get up early every morning, work hard, raise a family, make a few friends, contribute to their community, and retire. Their names never appear in the newspaper, but they are the bedrock of our society. Karl Stephan pays tribute to one of these men, a black blacksmith in central Texas named Ulysses Cephas, in a wise and touching essay. Read it below.
|Remembering a true Texas engineer|
Karl D. Stephan | FEATURES | 16 August 2016
Ulysses Cephas is not a household name, but he is a symbol of integrity, service and true professionalism.
|101 Tips for a Happier Marriage|
Tamara El-Rahi | FAMILY EDGE | 16 August 2016
This book is great - simple, achievable hints for a better relationship.
|Young men should turn their backs on pointless university degrees|
Laura Perrins | FEATURES | 16 August 2016
So what if women are dominating university admissions?
|Here’s one clear and uncomplicated principle for voting|
Sheila Liaugminas | SHEILA REPORTS | 16 August 2016
Don’t vote for pro-abortion politicians
|Pennsylvania’s rainbow-coloured Joan of Arc in disgrace|
Michael Cook | CONJUGALITY | 16 August 2016
Attorney-General Kathleen Kane cynically manipulated the legal system
|How are you going to vote in the November election?|
Michael Cook | FEATURES | 16 August 2016
Participate in MercatorNet's survey and tell us your feelings about November.
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia
Designed by elleston
New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario