The victims of a “victimless practice”

Watching porn harms more than one person

Nicole M. King | Mar 29 2017 | comment

An Irish talk-radio station has been devoting its attention to pornography. To prepare for the week’s discussion, the station commissioned a poll of 1,000 people across the nation “to investigate their attitudes towards and consumption of pornography.”

“According to research,” Newstalk says, “67% of Irish people admit to having ever consumed porn, with 35% saying that [they] have watched hardcore videos.” In addition, 8% of those polled admitted to sending naked photographs of themselves, 45% to reading or watching erotic books or films, and 56% to looking at pictures of other people in the nude. One in ten admit to consuming porn on a weekly basis.

The survey follows a warning last year by Ireland’s Taoiseach (prime minister) Enda Kenny about pornography. "There is clearly an issue there that needs to be addressed," he said. "[It's] very hard to address it given the range and ferocity of avalanche of communications of all descriptions that are coming at young people now. Young minds are being in some cases corrupted and tainted by an avalanche of this kind of material".

The poll also discovered that many parents are worried about the prospect of their teens becoming involved in porn consumption, and rightly so, as the poll discovered that most people were 17 when they began consuming porn, and a high percentage even younger. And yet, the story closes with a cheerful admonition that “Experts say that porn can be a healthy part of sex.”

Not so likely, according to research, and perhaps even less so for the adolescent viewing audience.

The New Research: The Victims of a “Victimless Practice”

When progressives resist efforts to outlaw pornography, they lecture the public on the dangers of censoring a form of free expression that—so long as those producing it are consenting adults—victimizes no one. But progressives’ defence of pornography as victimless looks less and less credible as researchers uncover ever more evidence that pornography actually does harm both those who view it and those close to them.

The latest evidence that porn hurts people comes in a study recently completed by researchers at Harvard and Boston Universities, a study concluding that adolescents who view pornography are especially likely to suffer abuse from their dating partners.

The Harvard and Boston scholars launch their study acutely concerned about adolescent dating abuse (ADA). Sobering statistics indicate that “approximately 21% of girls and 10% of boys who attend high school in the U.S. experience either physical or sexual ADA each year,” especially alarming numbers given that previous studies have established that “sequelae of ADA can be severe and may include depression, anxiety, substance abuse, antisocial behavior, suicidal thoughts, injury, and death.”

No wonder that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have identified ADA as “a public health priority.”

To address that priority, the authors of the new study examine the relationship between ADA and pornography. This relationship certainly deserves scrutiny in light of “scientific evidence support[ing] the contention that exposure to some forms of sexually explicit material . . . may inspire copycat acts of sexualized violence or degradation, or increase sexual aggression.”

To gauge the linkage between ADA and adolescent viewing of pornography, the researchers analyze data collected in 2013-2014 from 72 economically deprived youth, mostly blacks and Hispanic, living in inner-city Boston. These data reveal a strong linkage between adolescent viewing of pornography and adolescent dating abuse. The researchers calculate that—compared to study participants who had not experienced dating aggression—ADA victims viewed pornography “approximately twice as often per week (2.4 vs. 1.1 times, p = 0.06), twice as often per month (8.3 vs. 3.8 times, p = 0.05), and approximately 2.6 times [as] frequently per year (37.1 vs. 14.0 times, p < 0.05).”

The ugly copy-cat effects of pornography—anticipated by the researchers—show up clearly in this new study. The authors of the study report that about half (50%) of ADA victims had been asked to engage in a sexual act their partner first saw in pornography. Unsurprisingly, most of those receiving such requests (58%) “did not feel happy to have been asked.”

Understandably, the researchers see in their findings reason to give “clinicians, educators, parents, and other youth-serving professionals . . . guidance about how to talk factually with youth about present-day pornography, its potential impacts, and what they can do if they are being pressured to watch or perform pornographic acts.”

Nicole M. King is the Managing Editor of The Family in America. Republished from The Family in America, a MercatorNet partner site, with permission

Sources: Bryce Christensen and Nicole M. King, forthcoming in “New Research,” The Natural Family 31.2 [2017] Study: Emily F. Rothman and Avanti Adhia, “Adolescent Pornography Use and Dating Violence among a Sample of Primarily Black and Hispanic, Urban-Residing, Underage Youth,” Behavioral Sciences 6.1 [2016]: 1.

- See more at: https://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/the-victims-of-a-victimless-practice/19570#sthash.ODfY1cOP.dpuf

March 29, 2017

The hoo-ha over transgender rights has overshadowed the Emperor-has-no-clothes question of whether any of us can really be Sex A stuck in Body B. In this issue paediatrician Michelle Cretella reviews a new anthology by women who are pushing back against the orthodox view on Twitter, universities and the media.

Although many of the contributors are radical lesbians, the editor a priestess of the Greek goddess Diana, and Dr Cretella a pro-life conservative, she found that they had much in common. “I was deeply impressed by the radical feminist conviction that we are sacred embodied sexual beings, and by the great reverence for a woman's life-bearing power which flows from the latter,” she writes.

Germaine Greer, the well-known Australian feminist, sums up the feeling of many of the contributors in her introduction: “Men who adopt femininity may believe that they are achieving femaleness, but femaleness is a tougher destiny than they can know or guess ... Femininity is a de-sexed masquerade. Men can be as good at it as women, but that does not make them women.”

This book represents an long-overdue development in the debate on transgender issues.