martes, 25 de abril de 2017

And then there were two | MercatorNet | April 25, 2017 |

And then there were two

| MercatorNet  | April 25, 2017 |

And then there were two

The traditional parties have been abandoned by voters in this year's presidential election in France
Ronnie Smith | Apr 25 2017 | comment 1 

So, rather unusually these days, the pre-election opinion polls turned out to be accurate. The first round of the French presidential election saw Emmanuel Macron (23.9 percent) and Marine Le Pen (21.4 percent) progress to the final reckoning on May 7.
There are many interesting points to discuss after the smoke of battle has cleared, the first being that what are termed the “mainstream” parties have been entirely excluded from the second round of voting. The centre-right Republicans and the Socialists will now have to consider if and how they can regroup after this obvious and unprecedented disaster.
François Fillon, the candidate for the centre-right Republicans (19.9 percent) was, in the end, unable to recover after his campaign was disabled by financial scandal and his arrogant response to the ongoing investigation of his affairs. However, he did get himself back into serious contention in the final weeks and many voters respected his fortitude and resilience. Les Republicaines are far from dead and they have enough experience and support in the country to get themselves back in the game over the next few years.
Benoît Hamon, the Socialist candidate, won fewer votes than expected (6.3 percent) and I suspect that he was squeezed by many natural socialist voters preferring Jean-Luc Mélenchonon the hard left and Emmanuel Macron on the centre left. This of course means that there are still plenty of socialists in France; it’s just that they no longer identify with the Socialist Party as it now is. The best one can say for Hamon and his party is that the only way is up.
As for Melenchon, the candidate of La France insoumise, and his more traditional and radical socialist campaign, with 19.6 percent of the vote he showed us that there is still life in the old French revolutionary dog yet. Together with the other three major candidates, Melenchon proved that French politics exhibits a more dynamic society than many others in Europe.
The overall turnout in this first round came very close to 80 percent. Few commentators expected such a strong popular commitment to the electoral process with many reporting general disillusionment if not downright disgust. Some polls showed the “don’t knows” holding more than 30 percent support on occasion and yet this election presents a picture of a surprisingly healthy political culture.
The situation that the French now face is that their next President will be inexperienced as far as holding elected public office is concerned and will have minimal party support within the legislature. Some commentators insist that this is a bad thing and will lead to a period of instability in government. This may be true in the case of Le Pen, with her more robust political style and confrontational programme. However, Macron, considered by many to be the most likely ultimate winner, seems more able and willing to make the deals necessary to keep his government afloat with support in both the Senate and the National Assembly. Of course he will have to tailor his programme accordingly but this is actually what he has been talking about all along.
As a result of this change in the political relationship between the executive and legislative arms of government, we should witness a very interesting evolutionary experiment that may breathe new life into a Fifth Republic that some had accused of being past its use-by date.
Whoever wins on May 7 will have to deal with the many problems that France currently faces, most importantly economic regeneration and national security. These are very big issues that require serious and imaginative solutions. The two candidates left standing offer the voters a very clear choice in terms of policy and approach.
The next two weeks will certainly be interesting but I think that Macron will, as expected, emerge the winner. Le Pen is unlikely to collect a sufficient number of votes from the eliminated candidates to succeed and I suspect that the final outcome will be something in the region of 66 to 33 percent, in favour of M. Macron.
This brings me to a final point. There are many good things about the French electoral system and it’s always interesting to observe the first round, being more than a dull two horse race. However, while the first round allows everyone to vote for whomever they want, the second round, particularly since the advent of the very divisive Front National, is about voting against a candidate you don’t like.
On May 7, many French voters will vote for Macron to keep Le Pen out of the Élysée Palace with Macron being their least disliked choice. This is a negative dynamic. Voting is a civic obligation that creates an active stakeholder relationship with the elected office holder. In the French electoral system, that relationship starts badly for a significant number of people and seldom improves during the period of the Presidency.
François Hollande, elected by many only in order to get rid of Nicolas Sarkozy, could probably tell you something about this problem. 
Ronnie Smith is a British writer. At present he is living in Languedoc, France.
- See more at:


April 25, 2017

Today is ANZAC Day in Sydney and I should have been up long before first light to attend the Dawn Service honouring the Australians and New Zealanders who died at Gallipoli in World War I -- and all the wars thereafter. Apart from Christmas, it is probably the public holiday here with the most deeply-felt religious sentiment, not excluding the Melbourne Cup.
But I slept in. My apologies. I missed the hushed crowds, Reveille, the Last Post, and the skirling of bagpipes. It was very slack of me.
To make up for this – as more French died at Gallipoli than Australians -- we feature Ronnie Smith’s analysis of the first round of the French elections. Emanuel Macron, the front-runner, is young, handsome, vaguely liberal and supports nice causes. The anti-EU, anti-immigrant candidate, Marine Le Pen, may crash, but that is cold comfort for voters who want a clear direction for their country. What do you think?

Michael Cook 

Euthanasia is a ‘sideshow’ in end-of-life care, says leading US bioethicist
By Paul Russell
Ezekiel Emanuel says that pain is the the reason people ask doctors to end their lives
Read the full article
And then there were two
By Ronnie Smith
The traditional parties have been abandoned by voters in this year's presidential election in France
Read the full article
Guardians of the Galaxy, Volume 2: a scientist’s review
By Michael Milford
Not exactly textbook perfect, but loads of fun
Read the full article
Canada’s long-awaited polygamy trial begins today
By Michael Cook
Will the prosecution succeed after decades of ignoring the problem?
Read the full article
Trump and the history of the ‘first 100 days’
By Robert Speel
Few presidents could brag about the impact of their first months in office
Read the full article
Reformation music: how the Word became words
By Chiara Bertoglio
Making Scripture intelligible to all was a guiding concern.
Read the full article
The Grand Inga
By Mathew Otieno
The Congo River may soon have the largest power station on earth
Read the full article
Nitschke creates his own euthanasia award
By Paul Russell
Honouring crass and undignified behaviour says something about the cause
Read the full article
Recession continues to haunt Greece
By Shannon Roberts
And the family is in crisis.
Read the full article
Euthanised organ donors could dramatically shorten waitlists, say Belgian doctors
By Michael Cook
There are some limitations, so the idea needs to be refined.
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

No hay comentarios: