| MercatorNet | May 24, 2017 |
China’s population may be smaller than official data suggests
Researchers suggest 90 million fewer people.
China may have 90 million fewer people than official data suggests. According to University of Wisconsin-Madison researcher Yi Fuxian, speaking at a symposium at Peking University on Monday, China’s real population may have been about 1.29 billion last year. That’s 90 million fewer people than the official figure released by the National Bureau of Statistics; the difference amounts to about twice the size of Spain’s entire population.
According to Yi, China’s official population data has been overstated since 1990. His research suggests that there were 377.6 million new births from 1991 to 2016, less than the official figure of 464.8 million. According to the South China Morning Post, Yi’s theory of overstated government data was echoed by other researchers attending the forum which called for the removal of population controls and improved data quality.
Liang Zhongtang, a researcher at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, also questions the accuracy of the official birth data:
“The population data since the adaption of one-child policy has been seriously false and the family planning report has been overstated by 30 per cent … The birth control policy which has lasted nearly four decades is not in accordance with reality. It is imperative that the government should abandon the family planning system.”
The research means that China’s rapidly ageing population and shrinking workforce may now be more serious than already feared. China already has the world’s largest population aged over 60. The figures would also mean that India may take over from China as the world’s largest country sooner than was previously thought.
Yi is the author of the book Big Country with an Empty Nest, an influential book which argues that China is in need of more births and should end forced population control which has created gender imbalance and inevitably inhumane consequences. Many Chinese bachelors must now go to extreme lengths to find a wife and there are wide-reaching economic consequences of the increasingly aged population.
With Chinese birth rates hardly taking off since the government’s change to a two child policy, Li’s research makes the case stronger that it is time for China to get rid of population control altogether.
“Now that you’re here … we’ve got a small favour to ask. More people are reading MercatorNet, but far fewer are donating. Unlike many online magazine, we haven’t put up a paywall and we don't have lots of obtrusive advertising. So you can see why we need to ask for your help.
MercatorNet’s independent, vibrant and informative articles take a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our views on human dignity matter – and because they might be your views as well.
If every fan of MercatorNet donated just $10, our future would be much more secure.
If every fan of MercatorNet donated just $10, our future would be much more secure.
| Donate Now |
May 24, 2017
Today we are running a special issue on surrogate motherhood. This was prompted by an editorial in the world's leading news magazine, The Economist, endorsing commercial surrogacy. In the first, Regula Staempfli, a left-leaning Swiss feminist, rips into supporters of a market in women and babies. "Human beings would never sell their organs or sell their wombs if it weren’t for financial necessity," she says. In the second, Pinki Virani, an Indian activist, journalist, and author of several books, says that journalists with "the white man-saviour-syndrome" should see what kind of lives Indian surrogate mothers really have before they promote commercialisation.
Finally, I have tried my hand at a parody of The Economist's elegant, but utilitarian, rhetoric. One of the last taboos is cannibalism. Could the world's leading news magazine defend that? Not a problem, if it is profitable and regulated. Tell us what you think.
Michael Cook
Editor
MERCATORNET
| Be revolutionary and support MercatorNet By Michael Cook MercatorNet needs your help Read the full article |  |
| What do the babies think about it? By Pinki Virani An Indian perspective on the international market in babies gestated by surrogate mothers Read the full article |  |
| Surrogate motherhood is not work; it is exploitation By Regula Staempfli Surrogacy negates all human values, no matter how well women are paid Read the full article |  |
| The Economist’s free market ideology fails vulnerable women By Michael Cook The world's most influential news magazine is campaigning for commercial surrogacy. Why not cannibalism? Read the full article |  |
| After Manchester, how can we make venues safer? By David Lowe Emergency services were well trained and responded well, but the attacks will not stop Read the full article |  |
| China’s population may be smaller than official data suggests By Shannon Roberts Researchers suggest 90 million fewer people. Read the full article |  |
| Civilisation would die without cultural appropriation By Campbell Campbell-Jack The latest moral panic would make the apostle Paul a hegemonic imperialist. Read the full article |  |
| Reading classic novels in an era of climate change By Philip Steer Literature won't save us from global warming but it can make us think about it. Read the full article | _175_140_c1_c_c.jpg) |
| Why is losing weight so difficult? By Zac Alstin A philosopher thinks himself thin. Read the full article |  |
| If you want teens to thrive, teach them to avoid sexual risks By Valerie Huber Risk reduction approaches sell them short. Read the full article |  |
| Increased global migration By Marcus Roberts Is it the answer to the west's demographic problems? Read the full article |
MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia
Designed by elleston
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario