miércoles, 13 de diciembre de 2017

The reason for the season |MercatorNet|December 13, 2017|MercatorNet|

The reason for the season

|MercatorNet|December 13, 2017|MercatorNet|

The reason for the season

Taking Christ out of Christmas makes the holiday literally meaningless.
James Schall SJ | Dec 12 2017 | comment 2 

A friend sent me a copy of a very short Peanuts booklet entitled Christmas Stocking. It purported to contain “two never-before-reprinted Peanuts Holiday Classics.” I am never able to pass by a new or old Peanuts and leave it unread.
The very first scene shows a winter-wrapped Linus talking to a befuddled Charlie Brown. With great earnestness, Linus tells Charlie: “I am not going to hang up a Christmas stocking this year. I’ve decided it’s not scriptural.”
But lots of things about the way we celebrate Christmas are not in the Bible. Christmas in the upper latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere is usually pictured against a wintery background, something not quite so easily associated with Christmas in the Southern Hemisphere.
Theologically, though, Christmas is Christmas in both hemispheres. Christmas overshadows and transforms everything it touches. Those who currently oppose it work hard to remove it from music, shop-windows, greetings, gifts, and even an intelligible statement of what it means
Christmas is about an historical event that took place in the Roman province of Judaea during the time of Caesar Augustus. He wanted a census to be taken. In Palestine, this counting meant that the head of a family had to register in the place of his birth and tribal association – Bethlehem, in the case of Joseph.
Christmas has to do with the birth of a Child, a Son, to a woman named Mary, whose husband, Joseph, took them to Bethlehem because of this census. He was of the House of David. Later he took Mary and the Child to Egypt to escape the local ruler Herod, who had threatened the Child because of what he heard about Him, that He was a king or some such thing.
We know something of the events leading up to this journey to Bethlehem. Mary and Joseph lived in an out-of-the-way place called Nazareth. Mary was told that the Child that was to be born to her was to be named Emmanuel, or “God with us”. He was, in fact, not Joseph’s son but the Son of God. So while the Christmas stocking may not be scriptural, the name and nature of who was born comes to us from the Gospels and Paul, with reminiscences from the Old Testament.
Many sceptical scholars and politicians in different times and places have sought to cast doubt on the truth of this narrative. Especially today, in many, including democratic, places, one is not free to affirm this event in public. People, we are told, have a “right” not to hear it. It is not “scientific”.
More than just sentiment    
Later in the booklet, Lucy, with Snoopy, is seen mailing a letter. “You know what I just did?” she asks the clueless Beagle. “I just mailed a letter to Santa Claus.” Walking away from the mail box, with Snoopy following, she continues: “Being a stupid Beagle, of course, you wouldn’t understand about that.”
Once inside sitting on the couch, Lucy explains to Snoopy, as he lounges beside her, what Christmas is all about. “Each year little kids all over the world write to this fat guy up in the North Pole. They tell him what they want for Christmas.”
Snoopy listens carefully as Lucy informs him what happens next. “Then on Christmas Eve he flies through the air in a sleigh with a bunch of reindeer, and brings all these kids the things they ask for…Why? I don’t know.” Lucy shows uncharacteristic ignorance here.
The next scene has no words. Snoopy is shown sitting under a barren tree gazing out on the world with some perplexity. In the final scene, the Beagle is shown reclining on his back on top of his dog house. A decorated Christmas tree is seen to its side. He simply says to himself: “I’m going to have to be careful…All this theology could ruin my Christmas.”
So hanging stockings is not scriptural and too much theology could ruin Christmas. But Christmas cannot exist without a proper theological explanation. Essential to a “Merry Christmas” is the accurate knowledge of what Christmas means, be it in the Southern or the Northern Hemisphere. Christmas, though it does not disdain them, is not just stockings, mistletoe, lighted trees, reindeer, and gifts.
The essence of Christmas is this: The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us. The Word is the Second Person in the Trinity. He is True God who, while remaining God, became true man. Thus, He was born of woman, in a specific time and in a designated place. Once this birth took place, the world simply was not and could not be the same. The Word is not only the Word made flesh, but the Word through whom all things that exist are made and come forth into their own existence.
Christ comes into the world for a purpose. Basically, this purpose is to remind every human person why he exists. He exists in this world, but not for it. It is not his final home. In The Four Men, Belloc wrote:
"Whatever you read in all the writings of men, and whatever you hear in all the speech of men, and whatever you notice in the eyes of men, of expression or reminiscence or desire, you will see nothing in any man’s speech or writing or expression to match that which marks his hunger for home."
Intrinsic to our very being is this hunger for a permanent home. The Incarnation and Birth of Christ tell us where this home is. It is not in this world, though we have, and should have, proper homes in this world.
The “essence” of Christianity, to borrow a phrase from the 19th Century German philosopher Feuerbach, begins when we know that what happened at Bethlehem was the coming of the Son of God to dwell amongst us and to redeem us. Subsequent history is a struggle to accept or reject this fact and what it implies for each of us. Every effort is made to prevent us from recognizing and stating clearly just who the Christ born into this world of Mary is. Whatever our doubts and blindness, the fact remains. The world is judged by this truth.
Contrary to Snoopy, “all this theology” does not ruin our Christmas. Without an accurate theology, we do not have a Christmas, a home wherein we are to dwell in everlasting light and life. It is striking that the Child born in Bethlehem only lived some 33 years. It was enough.
If we read the Nicene Creed carefully, we will see that it takes great pains to tell us, not how we should live, but what we should hold about what is revealed beginning with the birth in Bethlehem to the Crucifixion, Resurrection, and on to the Ascension.
God takes our minds seriously, even if we do not. At Christmas, if we do not know who and what Christ is, we will not really know what anything else really is. Once we know, stockings, reindeer, presents, gifts, wonder, all make sense.
The one essential thing that God intended to tell us in the Nativity of Christ concerned the only way to His Father. Having informed us of this truth, Christ was crucified, died, and was buried, but He rose again on the third day.
Our “hunger for home”, about which Belloc wrote so beautifully, takes on its final clarity when Christ, the Son of God, did not have a home at His birth in this world. It was only fitting, as what He taught was precisely that we have no final home in this world. This is what Christmas is about. The realization even in this world, as Chesterton put it, that we feel homesick even at home.
The crisis of our time swirls around the fact that so many of us refuse to acknowledge the centrality of homes both in this world and in the next.
Christmas, in the end, is a theological problem. The hanging of stockings is not in scripture. What is in scripture is that the Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us. Once this event happened, as it did, nothing is really the same. 
Rev. James V. Schall SJ taught political science at Georgetown University for many years. He is the author of numerous books.


December 13, 2017

The resignation of US Congressman Trent Franks last Friday after allegations by former female staff members that he propositioned them about surrogacy has shocked the pro-life movement, in which he is a notable figure. Whatever was wrong in his behaviour, it is also apparent that he is confused about the ethics of surrogate gestation.

Franks opposes surrogacy procedures that discard embryos, but as Marjorie Murphy Campbell's commentary shows, he does not see that surrogacy as such is an offence against the woman (albeit she agrees to do it), making her an object in the pursuit of one’s personal desire for a child – who, I would add, is also offended and objectified by being cut off from its natural mother.

Indeed, if we paid more attention to “the child” today, and our intuitions about what is best for a child, it would be much easier to get our ethics right. As Margaret Somerville writes today regarding two other public issues: “A common mistake is not recognizing that we need to take into account both our emotional responses and intuitions, and what reason tells us in deciding on ethics.”

But at a time when public media give a platform to the “save the earth, have fewer children” brigade, the child seems in danger of being completely relativised. See Marcus Robert’s piece.

Carolyn Moynihan 
Deputy Editor,
Navigating the ‘post-truth’ world
By Margaret Somerville
Can this idea help us to understand debates over same-sex marriage and euthanasia?
Read the full article
Solicitation for surrogacy: the resignation of Trent Franks
By Marjorie Murphy Campbell
Indignation over the forced resignation of the pro-life Congressman is misplaced.
Read the full article
The morality of having children
By Marcus Roberts
For the sake of the planet, should we be having fewer kids?
Read the full article
The reason for the season
By James Schall SJ
Taking Christ out of Christmas makes the holiday literally meaningless.
Read the full article
Reading Matters 2017 Gift List
By Jennifer Minicus
Our top picks for 2017
Read the full article
Our Lady of Guadalupe: the soul of Mexico
By James Bradshaw
The iconic and mysterious image changed Mexico forever.
Read the full article
Two years of euthanasia in Quebec: the facts
By Aubert Martin
The Canadian province is accelerating past Belgium
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AU | +61 2 8005 8605

No hay comentarios: