NYT reporters behind Kavanaugh story suggest key information was removed by editors
New York Times reporters behind Kavanaugh story say key info was in original draft
The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Justice Kavanaugh claimed in an interview Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation." Both insisted in an interview that key information at the center the uproar over their story was included in their original draft of the piece. Pogrebin then explained that the Times doesn't usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information -- that the alleged victim didn't remember the incident -- was also removed. "So I think it was just sort of an editing -- you know, done in the haste in the editing process," she added.
The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Justice Kavanaugh claimed in an interview Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process. The piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly was adapted from their forthcoming book, "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation." Both insisted in an interview that key information at the center the uproar over their story was included in their original draft of the piece. Pogrebin then explained that the Times doesn't usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information -- that the alleged victim didn't remember the incident -- was also removed. "So I think it was just sort of an editing -- you know, done in the haste in the editing process," she added.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario